<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s a Big, Wide, Wonderful World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://midiguru.wordpress.com/2012/04/20/its-a-big-wide-wonderful-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://midiguru.wordpress.com/2012/04/20/its-a-big-wide-wonderful-world/</link>
	<description>Random Rambling &#38; Questionable Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 04:52:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conrad Cook</title>
		<link>http://midiguru.wordpress.com/2012/04/20/its-a-big-wide-wonderful-world/#comment-3017</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Conrad Cook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://midiguru.wordpress.com/?p=3091#comment-3017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve often thought along this line too, Jim.  Ofc, to think of an &lt;i&gt;interactive&lt;/i&gt; story is another animal altogether.  My experience in the Occupy encampment in dealing with journalists impressed me with how good they are at finding the story, and weeding through interesting but irrelevant facts for that purpose.

To your point, it seems that evocative details are almost irrelevant to narrative.  Most evocative stories can be retold, keeping the narrative intact, and made boring.  A beautiful and a plain face both are faces.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve often thought along this line too, Jim.  Ofc, to think of an <i>interactive</i> story is another animal altogether.  My experience in the Occupy encampment in dealing with journalists impressed me with how good they are at finding the story, and weeding through interesting but irrelevant facts for that purpose.</p>
<p>To your point, it seems that evocative details are almost irrelevant to narrative.  Most evocative stories can be retold, keeping the narrative intact, and made boring.  A beautiful and a plain face both are faces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
